Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Measurement Frameworks/ Metrics Programs

  1. Abreu, F.B.e; Carapuca, R.: Candidate Metrics for Object-Oriented Software within a Taxonomy Framework. Journal of Systems and Software, 26(1994)1, pp. 87-96
  2. Akingbehin, K.: A Structured Framework for Software Metrics Based on Three Primary Metrics. IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2010. pp. 749 - 752
  3. Akingbehin, K.; Maxim, B.: A Three-Layer Model for Software Engineering Metrics. Seventh ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2006. SNPD 2006. pp. 17 - 20
  4. Ashley, N.: METKIT: training in how to use measurement as a software management tool. Software Quality Journal, 3(1994)3, pp. 129-136
  5. Bache, R.; Bazzana, G.: Software Metrics for Product Assessment. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1994
  6. Bache, R.; Neil, M.: Introducing Metrics into Industry: A Perspective on GQM. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 26
  7. Balla, K.; Bemelmans, T.; Kusters, R.; Trienekens, J.: QMIM: Quality through Managed Improvement and Measurement. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 315-326
  8. Basili, V.R.; Selby, R.W.; Hutchens, D.H.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(1986)7, pp. 733-743
  9. Bell, G. A.; Cooper, M. A.; Jenkins, J. O.; Page, A.; Qureshi, S.; Warwick, J.: The Holon Framework: A Software Project Post Mortem Case Study. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 55-66
  10. Benedicenti, L.; Curry, W.; Mintchev, M.; Smith, M.; Succi, G.: A standard measuring procedure for software engineering. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 129-136
  11. Benford, S.D.; Burke, E.K.; Foxley, E.: Integrating Software Quality Assurance Into the Teaching of Programming. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 23
  12. Benford, S.D.; Burke, E.K.; Foxley, E.: Learning to construct quality software with the Ceilidh system. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)3, pp. 177-197
  13. Berry, M.; Jeffery, R.: An Instrument for Assessing Software Measurement Programs. Empirical Software Engineering, 5(2000), pp. 183-200
  14. Berry, M.; Vandenbroeck, M.F.: A Targeted Assessment of the Software Measurement Process. International Software Metrics Symposium, London 4-6 April, 2001, pp. 222-235
  15. Berry, M.; Vandenbroeck, M.F.: A Targeted Assessment of the Software Measurement Process: How Good was that Assessment?. Empirical Software Engineering Conference, Keele 2001 (11 p.)
  16. Bhide, S.: Generalized Software Process-integrated Metrics Framework. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 249-254
  17. Biffl, S.; Grechening, T.: Establishing reviewing and automatic analysis fo code in everyday's coding practice. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Quality, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 4-6 October 1993, pp. 165-172
  18. Birk, A.; Solingen, R.v.; Järvinen, J.: Business Impact, Benefit, and Cost of Applying GQM in Industry: An In-Depth, Long-Term Investigation at Schlumberger RPS. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 93-96
  19. Bofilios, D.; Pournaras, A.: Metrics based improvements for SMEs - An ESSIE PIE. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 73-80
  20. Boliox, G.; Robillard, P.N.: A Software System Evaluation Framework. IEEE Computer, December 1995, pp. 17-26
  21. Buglione, L.: GUFPI-ISMA: a brief history of the Italian Software Metrics Association. Metrics News, 6(2001)2, pp. 23-25
  22. Buglione, L.; Abran, A.: QF2D: A Different Way to Measure Software Quality. In: Dumke/Abran: New Approaches in Software Measurement, LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001, pp. 205-219
  23. Burton, V.; Albert, L.: The Extended Metrics Project. Proc. of the IWSM'99, Lac Superieur, Quebec, Canada, September 1999, pp. 66-94
  24. Bush, M.E.; Fenton, N.E.: Software Measurement: A Conceptual Framework. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 223-231
  25. Bush, M.; Russell, M.: A New Modular Course For Teaching About Software Engineering Measurement Within Academia. Project No. 2384 - METKIT, London, 1991
  26. Cantone, G.; Cantone, L.; Donzelli, P.: Modelling and measuring software technologies. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 83-93
  27. Card, D.N.; Glass, R.L.: Measuring Software Design Quality. Prentice-Hall Inc., 1990
  28. Cavano, J.P.: Toward High Confidence Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(1985)12, pp. 1449-1455
  29. Chirinos, L.; Losavio, F.; Boegh, J.: Characterizing a data model for software measurement. Journal of Systems and Software, 74(2005)2, pp. 207-226
  30. Cole, R.J.; Woods, D.: Measurement Through The Software Lifecycle: A Comparative Case Study. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 19
  31. Coletta, A.: SPICE Trials Feedback and Tuning of the Measurement Framework. Proc. of the Conference on Software Measurement and Management, February 5-9, Rome, Italy, 1996 (6 p.)
  32. Comer, P.; Chard, J.: A measurement maturity model. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 277-289
  33. Cowdero, A.J.C.; Donaldson, A.J.M.; Jenkins, J.O.: A metrics framework for multimedia creation. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 144-147
  34. Cox, G.M.: Sustaining a Software Metrics Programme in Industry. in: Fenton/Littlewood: Software Reliability and Metrics, Elsevier Applied Science, London New York, 1991, pp. 1-15
  35. Cruickshank, K.J.; Michael, J.B.; Man-Tak Shing: A Validation Metrics Framework for safety-critical software-intensive Systems. IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2009. SoSE 2009. pp. 1 - 8
  36. Cugola , G. et al.: A Case Study of Evaluating Configuration Management Practices with Goal-Oriented Measurement. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 144-151
  37. Daskalantonakis, M.K.: A Practical View of Software Measurement and Implementation Experiences Within Motorola. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(1992)11, pp. 998-1010
  38. Debou, C.; Pescoller, L.; Fuchs, N.: Software measurements on telecom sytems - Success stories? Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Quality, Madrid, November 1993
  39. Deininger, M.: Quantitative Erfassung der Software und ihres Entstehungsprozesses. Ph. Dissertation, University of Stuttgart, 1995
  40. DeMarco, T.: Controlling Software Projects - Management Measurement & Estimation. Yourdon Inc./ Prentice-Hall Inc., 1982
  41. Diaz-Ley, M.; Garcia, F.; Piattini, M.: MIS-PyME software measurement capability maturity model - Supporting the definition of software measurement programs and capability determination. Advances in Engineering Software (41(2010)10-11, pp. 1223-1237
  42. Differding, C.M.: Reuse of Measurement Plans Based on Process and Quality Models. Proc. of the LCO 2001, Kaiserslautern, Germany, September 2001, pp. 207-221
  43. Dion, F.; Abran, A.: Decision and Justification in the Context of Industrial-Level Software Engineering. Proc. of the IWSM'99, Lac Superieur, Quebec, Canada, September 1999, pp. 2-9
  44. Dumke, R.: A Framework for Software Measurement Evaluation. Proc. of the IWSM'99, Lac Superieur, Quebec, Canada, September 1999, pp. 24-37
  45. Dumke, R.: An Object-Oriented Software Measurement and Evaluation Framework and its Application in an Industrial Environment. Proc. of the CONQUEST 98, Nurenberg, 28./29. Sept. 1998, pp. 52-61
  46. Dumke, R. R.: Aspect-Oriented vs. Holistic Measurement Frameworks. In: Büren, G.; Dumke, R.; Münch, J.: MetriKon 2011 - Praxis der Software-Messung. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2011, S. 95-106
  47. Dumke, R.: Erfahrungen in der Anwendung eines allgemeinen objektorientierten Measurement Frameworks. in: Dumke/Lehner: Software-Metriken, DUV, 2000, (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5), pp. 71-90
  48. Dumke, R.R.: New Challenges in Software Measurement. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering in Practice (IWESEP 2009), October 23, 2009, Osaka, Japan, S. 1-24
  49. Dumke, R.: Software Measurement Frameworks. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress for Software Quality (Vol. III), Munich, September 2005, pp. 75-84, 2005
  50. Dumke, R.: Von den Metriken zu den Messinfrastrukturen - effiziente Software-Messprozesse im IT-Bereich. Freiburg Embedded Systems Talks - Academia meets Indurstry (FEST-AmI 2008), 13.-17. Oktober, 2008, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
  51. Dumke, R.; Abran, A.: Current Trends in Software Measurement. Shaker Publ., Aachen, Germany, 2001 (ISBN 3-8265-9681-1)
  52. Dumke, R.; Abran, A.: New Approaches in Software Measurement. LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001 (ISBN 3-540-41727-3)
  53. Dumke, R.; Abran, A.; Bulgione, L.: Suggestion for Improving Measurement Plans: First Results from a BMP Application. Proceedings of the 3rd Software Measurement European Forum (Smef 2006), May, 10-12, 2006, Rome, Italy, S. 209-224
  54. Dumke, R.R.; Braungarten, R.; Kunz, M.; Schmietendorf, A.; Wille, C.: Strategies and Appropriateness of Software Measurement Frameworks. Proc. of the MENSURA 2006, November, 6-8, 2006, Cádiz, Spain, pp. 150-170
  55. Dumke, R.; Ebert. C.; Heidrich, J.; Wille, C.: Messung und Bewertung von Software - Stand der Technik und Ausblick. Informatik-Spektrum, 36(2013)6, S. 508-519
  56. Dumke, R. R.; Foltin, E.: An Object-Oriented Software Measurement and Evaluation Framework. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 59-68
  57. Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Winkler, A.: A Framework for Object-Oriented Software Measurement and Evaluation. Proc. of the SE'98, Las Vegas, October 28-31, 1998, pp. 129-132
  58. Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Winkler, A.: Measurement-Based Quality Assurance in Object-Oriented Software Development. Proc. of the OOIS'95, Dublin, Ireland, 18 - 20 Dec. 1995, pp. 315-319
  59. Dumke, R.; Goetzke, C.; Winkler, A.: Total Quality Management In Object-Oriented Software Development. Proceedings of the Third International Confenrence on Software Quality, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 4-6 October 1993, pp. 109-116
  60. Dumke, R.; Kuhrau, I.: Tool-Based Quality Management in Object-Oriented Software Development. Proc. of the Third Symposium on Assessment of Quality Software Development Tools, Washington D.C., June 7-9, 1994, IEEE Society Press, pp. 148-160
  61. Dumke, R.; Lehner, F.: Software Metriken - Entwicklungen, Werkzeuge und Anwendungsverfahren. Deutsche Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, 2000 (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5)
  62. Dumke, R.; Lother, M.; Abran, A.: An Approach for Integrated Software Measurement Processes in the IT Area. Proc. of the FESMA 2001, Heidelberg, My 2001, pp. 15-29
  63. Dumke, R.; Schmietendorf, A.; Seufert, M.; Wille, C.: Handbuch der Softwareumfangsmessung und Aufwandschätzung. Logos-Verlag, Berlin, 2014, (570 S.), ISBN 978-3-8325-3784-5
  64. Dumke, R.; Winkler, A.: Object-Oriented Software Measurement in an OOSE Paradigm. Proc. of the Confenrence on Software Measurement and Management (IFPUG'96), Fenruary 5-9, Rome, Italy, 1996 (12 p.)
  65. Ebert, C.: A Method for controlling the complexity in the software development process. (german) Ph.D., VDI Publisher, Duesseldorf,1995
  66. Ebert, C.: Dumke, R.: Software Metrics in Practice. (German) Springer Publ., 1996
  67. Ebert, C.; Dumke, R.; Bundschuh, M.; Schmietendorf, A.: Best Practices in Software Measurement. Springer Publ., 2004
  68. Edison, H.; Bin Ali, N.; Torkar, R.: Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(2013)5, pp. 1390-1407
  69. Eickelmann, N.: Integrating the Balanced Scorecard and Software Measurement Frameworks. Proc. of the IRMA 2000, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2000, pp. 980-983
  70. Eickelmann, N.: Strategic and Software Measurement Frameworks to Assess the Value of Information Technology. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 403-413
  71. Eman, K.E.; Drouin, J.N.; Melo, W.: SPICE - The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society, 1998
  72. Endres, Albert; Rombach, D.: A Handbook of Software and System Engineering. Pearson Education Limited, 2003
  73. Erni, K.; Lewerentz, C.: Applying Design-Metrics to Object-Oriented Frameworks. Proc. of the Third International Software Metrics Symposium, March 25-26, Berlin, 1996, pp. 64-74
  74. Ernst, D.; Houdek, F.: Applying metrics to cross-technical evaluations. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 257-270
  75. Evanco, W.M.; Lacovara, R.: A Model-Based Framework for the Integration of Software Metrics. The Journal of Systems and Software, 26(1994)1, pp. 77-86
  76. ] Farooq, A. and Dumke, R. R.: Developing and applying a consolidated evaluation framework to analyze test process improvement approaches. In IWSM-MENSURA 2007: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, volume 4895 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 114–128. Springer Publ. 2007.
  77. Fayad, M.E.; Tsai, W.; Fulghum, M.L.: Transition to Object-Oriented Software Development. Comm. of the ACM, 39(1996)2, pp. 108-121
  78. Fenton, N.E.: Systems Construction and Analysis – A Mathematical and Logical Framework. McGraw-Hill, 1993
  79. Fenton, N. E.; Pfleeger, S. L.: Software Metrics - a rigorous and practical approach. Thompson Publ., 1997
  80. Frederiksen, H.D.; Mathiassen, L.: A Contextual Approach to Improving Software Metrics Practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2008)4, pp. 602-616
  81. Fuchs, N.: Software Measurement -- An Evolutionary Approach. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 9
  82. Gaffney et al.: The Software Measurement Guidebook. Thomson Publ., 1995
  83. Garcia, F. et. Al.: Effective use of ontologies in software measurement. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 24(2009)1, pp. 23-40
  84. Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R.; Neumann, R.; Farooq, A.: Software Measurement Modelling and Improvement. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research & Practice (SERP 2009), Volume II, WORLDCOMP'09,July 13-16, 2009, Las Vegas Nevada, USA, S. 396-402
  85. Gilchrist, T.: A Framework For Measurement Programs. Proceedings of the Third International Confenrence on Software Quality, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 4-6 October 1993, pp. 101-108
  86. Goldenson, D. R.; Gopal, A.; Mukhopadhyay, T.: Determinants of Success in Software Measurement Programs: Initial Results, Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 10-21
  87. Gonzalez, R.R.: A Unified Metric of Software Complexity: Measuring Productivity, Quality and Value. The Journal of Systems and Software, 29(1995)1, pp. 17-37
  88. Goodman, P.: The Practica Implementation of Process Improvement Initiatives. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 20
  89. Gopal, A.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Krishnan, M.S.: The impact of institutional forces on software metrics programs. IEEE Transactions onSoftware Engineering, 31(2005)8, pp. 679-694
  90. Grady, R.B.: Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, 1992
  91. Grady, R.B.; Caswell, D.L.: Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1987
  92. Gunnalan, R.; Shereshevsky, M.; Ammar, H.H.: Pseudo dynamic metrics. The 3rd ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, 2005, p. 117
  93. Günther, D.; Neumann, R.; Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R.R.: Causal Networks Based Process Improvement. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2011), July 7-9, 2011, Miami Beach, Florida, USA, Printed by Knowledge Systems Institute Illinois, USA, S. 462-465, ISBN 1-891706-29-2
  94. Hall, T.; Fenton, N.: Implementing Effective Software Metrics Program. IEEE Software, March/April 1997, pp. 55-65
  95. Hamann, D.; Beitz, A.; Müller, M.; Solingen, R. van: Using FAME Assessments to Define Measurement Goals. In: Dumke/Abran: New Approaches in Software Measurement, LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001, pp. 220-232
  96. Hastings, T.: An Object-Oriented Context for Software Measurement. Proc. of the ACOSM'96, November 19-21, Melbourne Australia, 1996
  97. Henderson-Sellers, B.: Object-Oriented Metrics - Measures of Complexity.Prentice Hall, 1996
  98. Hevner, A.R.: Phase containment metrics for software quality improvement.Information and Software Technology, 39(1997), pp. 867-877
  99. Hofmann, I.: Ein Nutzen optimierender qualitätssichernder Messprozess für die Entwicklung eingebetteter Softwaresysteme. Reihe: Dumke (Hrsg.): Magdeburger Schriften zum Empirischen Software Engineering, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2005, 163 S., ISBN 3-8322-4158-2
  100. Hudepohl, J.P. et al.: Emerald: Software Metrics and Models. IEEE Software, September 1996, pp. 56-60
  101. Hussein, A.; Dumke, R.: A Dynamic Modular Framework for Enhancing the Security of Enterprise Business Processes. In: Schmietendorf/Patzer: BSOA 2012 - 7. Workshop Bewertungsaspekte serviceorientierter Architekuren, Shaker-Verlag, 2012, S. 127-136
  102. Hussein, A.; Dumke, R.; Wille, C.: Modeling the Behavior of Business Processes - Security Enhancement Framework. In: Büren et al.: Metrikon 2012 - Praxis der Software-Messung, Shaker-Verlag 2012, S. 53-68
  103. Iivari, N.; Jokela, T.: Evaluating a Usability Capability Asessment. Proc. of the PROFES 2001, Kaiserslautern, Germany, September 2001, pp. 98-109
  104. ISO/IEC 9126 2001: Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 1. Quality Model. International Organization for Standardization - ISO, Geneva 2001
  105. ISO/IEC 9126 TR 2003: Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 2. External Metrics & Part 3: Internal Metrics. International Organization for Standardization - ISO, Geneva 2003
  106. ISO/IEC 9126 TR 2004: Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 4: Quality in Use Metrics. International Organization for Standardization - ISO, Geneva 2004
  107. The ITIL Home Page, www.itil.org.uk/what.htm, (see July 24, 2013)
  108. Järvinen, J.; Hamann, D.; Solingen, R. van: On Integrating Assessment and Measurement: Towards Continuous Assessment of Software Engineering Processes. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 22-30
  109. Jansen, P.: The SPICE Measurement Framework for Measuring Software Process Capabilities. Proc. of the Conference on Software Measurement and Management (IFPUL'96), February 5-9, Rome, Italy, 1996 (11 p.)
  110. Jeffery, R.; Berry, M.: A Framework for Evaluation and Prediction of Metrics Program Success. Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, May 21-22, 1993, pp. 28-39
  111. Jones, C.: Software Benchmarking. IEEE Computer, October 1995, pp. 102-103
  112. Junling Huang; Far, B.H.: Intelligent software measurement system (ISMS). Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005, pp. 1033-1036
  113. Keil, M.; Cule, P.; Lyytinen, K.; Schmidt, R.: A Framework for Identifying Software Project Risks. In Communications of the ACM. 1998
  114. Kilpi, T.: Implementing a Software Metrics Program at Nokia. IEEE Software November/December 2001, pp. 72-77
  115. Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating Methods and Tools, Part 8: Analysing a Feature Analysis Evaluation. Software Engineering Notes, 22(1997)5, pp. 10-12
  116. Kitchenham, B.A.: Software Metrics - Measurement for Software Process Improvement. NCC Blackwell Ltd, 1996
  117. Kitchenham, B.A.; Linkman, S.G.; Law, D.T.: Critical review of quantitative assessment. Software Engineering Journal, 9(1994)2, pp.43-53
  118. Knight, J.C.; Myers, E.A.: An Improved Inspection Technique. Comm. of the ACM, 36(1993)11, pp. 51-61
  119. Koch, G.R.: Beyond SEI's CMM -- The European BOOTSTRAP Approach.Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 15
  120. Kokol, P.; Brest, J.; Zorman, M.; Podgorelec,V.: Integration of Complexity Metrics with the Use of Decision Trees. Software Engineering Notes, January 1998, pp. 56-58
  121. Komi-Sirviö, S.; Parviainen, P.; Ronkainen, J.: Measurement Automation: Methodological Background and Practical Solutions - A Multiple Case Study. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 306-316
  122. Kunz, M.; Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.; Wille, C.: Towards a Service-Oriented Measurement Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 3rd Software Measurement European Forum (Smef 2006), May, 10-12, 2006, Rome, Italy, S. 197-207
  123. Lami, G.; Fabbrini, F.; Buglione, L.: An ISO/IEC 33000-Compliant Measurement Framework for Software Process Sustainability Assessment. Joint Conference of the International Workshop on Software Measurement and the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-MENSURA), 2014, pp. 50-59
  124. Lamprecht, W.; Weber, C.: Benefits from user-focused measurement based on GQM. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 157-164
  125. Latum, F.v.; Solingen, R.v.; Oivo, M.; Hoisl, B.; Rombach, D.; Ruhe, G.:Adopting GQM-Based Measurement in an Industrial Environment. IEEE Software, Jan./February 1998, pp. 78-86
  126. Lehner, F.; Dumke, R.; Abran, A.: Software Metrics – Research and Practice in Software Measurement. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, 1997
  127. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Hao, K.: Software engineer behavior analysis measurement process in SW-KPA. IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), 2011, pp. 22-26
  128. Liggesmeyer, P.: Software Complexity Metrics as Basis for choosing test methods. (german) Softwaretechnik-Trends, 13(1993)3, pp. 103-110
  129. Lother, M.: From Software Measurement to Software e-Measurement, A Functional Size Measurement-oriented Approach for Software Management. Shaker Publ. 2006
  130. Lytz, R.: Software Metrics for the Boeing 777. Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  131. Lytz, R.: Early Metric Plans and Overall Schedules: A Case Study for the Boeing 777. Proc. of the AOWSM, June 5-7, 1995, Oregon,
  132. Lytz, R.: Software Metrics for the Boeing 777 - a case study Software Quality Journal, 4(1995), pp. 1-13
  133. Magee, P.: Starter Metrics System for Small Companies. Proc. of the 11th CSR Conference on Software Evolution, Models and Metrics. September 7-9, Dublin, Ireland, Section 5
  134. Matsumoto, K.; Kusumoto, S.; Kikuno, T.; Torii, K.; A New Framework of Measuring Software Development Process. Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, May 21-22, 1993, pp. 108-118
  135. Maurice, F.; Benzekri, A.; Raynaud, Y.: Introducing Rigorous Metrics Specification and Verification into a Measurement Program. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 12-19
  136. McGarry, J.; Card, D.; Jones, C.; Layman, B.; Clark, E.; Dean, J.; Hall, F.: Practical Software Measurement - Objective Information for Decision Makers. Addison Wesley Publ., 2002, (277 p.)
  137. Mencke, S.; Kunz, M.; Dumke, R.: Towards Metrics for Ontology Balance. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2008), July, 1-3, 2008, San Francisco, USA, S. 918-922
  138. Mencke, S.; Kunz, M.; Pukall, M.: Runtime Adaptations within the QuaD²-Framework. Proceedings of the ECOOP'2008 Workshop on Reflection, AOP and Meta-Data for Software Evolution (RAM-SE'08)
  139. Mencke, S.; Kunz, M.; Zenker, N.; Dumke, R.: Ontology-Based Generic Learning Path Recommendations. Proceedings of the 2008 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (Worldcomp 2008), July, 14-17, 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
  140. Miluk, G.: Software Kinetics -- Developing a Process for Software Process Improvement. Proceedings of the International Software Quality Conference, Dayton, Ohio, 1991, pp. 56-65
  141. Misra, S. (2005). An empirical framework for choosing an effective testing technique for software test process management. Journal of Information Technology Management, 16(4):19–25
  142. Möller, K. H.; Paulish, D. J.: Software Metrics – A Practitioner’s Guide to Improved Product Development. Chapman Hall, London, 1993
  143. Monperrus, M. et al.: Model-driven generative development of measurement software. Software and Systems Modeling, 10(2011)4, pp.537-552
  144. Mora, B.; Garci´a, F.; Ruiz, F.; Piattini, M.; Boronat, A.; Gomez, A.; Carsi, J.A.; Ramos, I.: Software Generic Measurement Framework Based on MDA. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 9(2011)1, pp. 864-871
  145. Mora, B.; Garcia, F.; Ruiz, Francisco; Piattini, M.: Model-Driven Software Measurement Framework: A Case Study. 9th International Conference on Quality Software, 2009. QSIC '09, pp. 239-248
  146. Morell, L.J.; Voas, J.M.: A Framework for Defining Semantic Metrics. The Journal of Systems and Software, 20(1993)3, pp. 245-251
  147. Morisio, M.: A methodology to measure the software process. Proc. of the AOWSM, June 5-7, 1995, Oregon, Section 1
  148. Muellerburg, M.; Meyerhoff, D.; Flacke, S.: Enhancing Accessability of Metrics Knowledge. Proceedings of the EUROMETRICS'91, March 1991
  149. Murine, G.E.; Murine, B.J.: Implementing a software quality metric program based on the Rome Laboratory initiative. Annals of Software Engineering, 1(1995)1, pp. 155- 177
  150. Myers, G.J.: A Controlled Experiment in Program Testing and Code Walkthroughs/ Inspections. Comm. of the ACM, 21(1978)9, pp. 760-768
  151. Offen, R.J.; Jeffery, R.: Establishing Software Measurement Programs. IEEE Software, March/April 1997, pp. 45-53
  152. NASA: Software Measurement Guidebook , NASA/SEL Report 94-102, July 1995 (134 p.)
  153. R. Neumann, S. Taggeselle, R. Dumke, A. Schmietendorf, F. Muhss, A. Fiegler: Combining Query Performance with Data Integrity in the Cloud - A Hybrid Cloud Storage Framework to Enhance Data Access on the Windows Azure Platform. Proceedings of The 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (Cloud 2012), Honolulu, USA, June 2012
  154. Niessink, F.; Vliet, H. van: Towards Mature Measurement Programs. Proc of the CSMR'98, March 8-11, 1998, Florence, Italy, pp. 82-88
  155. Niessink, F.; Vliet, H. van: Measurement program success factors revisited. Information and Software Technology, 43(2001)10, pp. 617-628
  156. Niessink, F.: Vliet, H. van: Measurement Should Generate Value, Rather then Data. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 31-38
  157. Nikora, A. P.; Munson, J. C.: An approach to the measurement of software evolution: Research Articles. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17(2005)1, pp. 65-91
  158. Offen, R. J.; Jefferey, R.: Establishing software measurement programs. IEEE Software, March/April 1997, pp. 45-53
  159. Olsson, T.; Runeson, P.: V-GQM: A Feed-Back Approach to Validation of a GQM Study. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 236-245
  160. Panfilis, S.D.; Kitchenham, B.; Morfuni, N.: Experiences introducing a measurement program. Information and Software Technology, 39(1997), pp. 745-754
  161. Paulus, V.; Seront, G.; Lopez, M.; Huvelle, C.; Bolle, B.: On the Applicability of FPA and COCOMO II in a Workflow and Maintenance Context. In: Abran, A.; Dumke, R.: Investigations in Software Measurement. Shaker-Verlag, 2005, S. 105-106
  162. Peitek, N.: Exploration of Competitive Market Behavior Using Near-Real-Time Sentiment Analysis. Master Thesis, University of Magdeburg, Germany, 2014
  163. Perkins, R.L.: The Characteristics Based Metrics Model: A Disciplined Approach to Implementing a Software Metrics Methodology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software Quality, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 5-7, pp. 34-39
  164. Pfleeger, S.L.: A metrics program to address corporate needs should include linking metrics to process maturity, a tools-evaluation database, and the use of multiple-metrics graphs. IEEE Software, May 1993, pp. 67-74
  165. Pfleeger, S.L.: Setting Up a Metrics Program in Industry. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29 September - 1 October 1993, Section 4
  166. Pfleeger, S.L.; McGowan, C.: Software Metrics in the Process Maturity Framework. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 255-261
  167. Redman, T.C.: Data Quality -- Management and Technology. Bantam Books, New York London Sydney, 1992
  168. Richter, K.; Dumke, R. R.: Modeling, Evaluating, and Predicting IT Human Resources Performance. CRC Publ., Boca Raton, 2015
  169. Rivet, M.; Desharnais, J.; Abran, A.: A cognitive approach and the implementation of a measurement program. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 151-159
  170. Robillard, P.N.; Coupal, D.; Coallier, F.: Profiling Software Through the Use of Metrics. Quality Engineering Workshop, Ottawa, 16.-17. Oktober, 1991
  171. Rombach, H.D.: Practical Benefits of Goal-Oriented Measurement. in: Fenton/Littlewood: Software Reliability and Metrics, Elsevier Applied Science, London New York, 1991, pp. 217-235
  172. Rombach, H.D.; Basili, V.R.; Selby, R.W.: Experimental Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directions. Proc. of the International Workshop in Dagstuhl Castl, September 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 706, Springer Publ., Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993
  173. Rosenberg, J.: Five Easy Steps to Systematic Data Handling. IEEE Software Jan./February 1998, pp. 75-77
  174. Rowe, A.; Whitty, R.: Ami: promoting a quantitative approach to software measurement. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 291-296
  175. Rudolf, E.: Experience in software metrics programs in practice. (German) in: Dumke/Zuse: Theorie und Praxis der Sofwtaremessung, Deutscher Universitaetsverlag, Wiesbaden, 1994, pp. 35-44
  176. Russell, M.: International Survey of Software Measurement Education and Training. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 233-241
  177. Schmietendorf, A.; Dimitrov, E.; Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Wipprecht, M.:Konzeption und erste Erfahrungen einer metrikenbasierten Software-Wiederverwendung. in: Dumke/Lehner: Software-Metriken, DUV, 2000, (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5), pp. 95-110
  178. Schmietendorf, A.; Wille, C.: Beiträge zum empirischen Software Engineering - eine Bilanz. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2012
  179. Schneidewind, N.F.: An Integrated Process and Product Model. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 224-234
  180. Schneidewind, N.F.: Controlling and predciting the quality of space shuttle software using metrics. Software Quality Journal, 4(1995), pp. 49-68
  181. Schneidewind, N.F.: Minimizing Risk in Applying Metrics on Multiple Projects. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 8-9, pp. 173-182
  182. Schulenklopper, J.; Vliet, J.C.v.;Swede, V.v.: Situational Metrics. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, Amsterdam, 29.9.-1.10.1993, Section 24
  183. Seidl, R.; Sneed, H.: Softwareevolution. dpunkt-Verlag, 2013
  184. Shelat, A. K.: Lessons Learned from establishing a measurement program in industry. Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Software Measurement and ICT Control, FESMA-DASMA 2001, May 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 365-371
  185. Shull, F.; Singer, J.; Sjoberg, D. I. K.: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer Publ., 2008
  186. Sneed, H. M.: Software Projektkalkulation. Hanser-Verlag München, 2005
  187. Solingen, R.v.; Berghout, E.; Kooiman, E.: Assessing Feedback of Measurement Data: Relating Schlumberger RPS practice to learning theory.Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 152-164
  188. SPC: The Measurement Guidebook. Thomsom Computer Press, 1995
  189. Sunazuka, T.; Azuma, M.; Yamagishi, N.: Software Quality Assessment Technology. Proceedings of the 8th International Confenrence on Software Engineering, August 28-30, London, 1985, pp. 142-148
  190. Toffolon, C.; Dakhli, S.: A framework for evaluation of co-operative software systems. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 477-485
  191. Troster, J.; Tian, J.: Measurement and defect modeling for a legacy software system. Annals of Software Engineering, 1(1995)1, pp. 95-118
  192. Varkoi, T. K.: Development of Measurement Programs to Support Software Process Improvement in Small Software Companies. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 141-149
  193. Vierimaa, M.; Tihinen, M.; Kurvinen, T.: Comprehensive approach to software measurement. Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Software Measurement and ICT Control, FESMA-DASMA 2001, May 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 237-246
  194. Voldner, P.: Canada: meeting the software quality challenge; current activities. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 239-243
  195. Werner, A.: A practical view to the evaluation of software quality (German). Angewandte Informatik, 25(1983)6, pp. 242-251
  196. Whitty, R.; Bush, M.; Russell, M.: METKIT and the ESPRIT Program. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 219-221
  197. Wilson, D.N.; Hall, T.; Badoo, N.: A framework for evaluation and prediction of software process improvement success. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59(2001)2, pp. 135-142
  198. Wille, C.; Günter, D.; Dumke, R.: Standardmaße im Software Engineering. In: Büren et al.: MetriKon 2012 - Praxis der Software-Messung, Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2012, S. 19-28
  199. Woodcock, T.G.; Koshgoftaar, T.M.: Metric Gathering Pitfalls. Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  200. Woodings, T.; Bundell, G.: A framework for sofwtare project metrics. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 77-86
  201. Ya-hong, L.; Jian, L.; Ke-gang, H.: The software project progress measurement frame based on GQM model. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2013, pp. 133-138
  202. Yourdon, E.: The Decline and Fall of the American Programmer. Prentice-Hall Inc. 1992
  203. Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.: Stability of Software Trustworthiness Measurements Models. IEEE 7th International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion (SERE-C), 2013, pp. 219-224
  204. Zuse, H.: A Framework of Software Measurement. De Gruyter Publ., Berlin, 1998

Cookie Einstellungen

Auf unserer Webseite werden Cookies verwendet. Einige davon werden zwingend benötigt, während es uns andere ermöglichen, Ihre Nutzererfahrung auf unserer Webseite zu verbessern. Wir bitten hiermit um Erlaubnis, die folgenden Cookies verwenden zu dürfen. Diese Einwilligung ist freiwillig, nicht für die Nutzung der Website erforderlich und kann jederzeit widerrufen werden.

Essentielle Cookies werden für grundlegende Funktionen der Webseite wie z.B. für die Anmeldung im Mitgliederbereich benötigt. Dadurch ist gewährleistet, dass die Webseite einwandfrei funktioniert.

Name omCookieConsent
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit 1 Jahr
Zweck Enthält die gewählten Tracking-Optin-Einstellungen.
Name fe_typo_user / PHPSESSID
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit aktuelle Session
Zweck Dieses Cookie ist ein Standard-Session-Cookie von TYPO3. Es speichert im Falle eines Benutzer-Logins die Session-ID. So kann der eingeloggte Benutzer wiedererkannt werden und es wird ihm Zugang zu geschützten Bereichen gewährt.

Diese Gruppe beinhaltet alle Skripte für analytisches Tracking und zugehörige Cookies. Es hilft uns die Nutzererfahrung der Website zu verbessern.

Name _pk_id.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 13 Monate
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.
Name _pk_ses.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 30 Minuten
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.