Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Module/ Procedure Measures

  1. Alan, E. B.; Khoshgoftaar, T. M.: Measuring Coupling and Cohesion: An Information-Theory Approach. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 119-127
  2. Allen, E. B.: Measuring Graph Abstractions of Software: An Information-Theory Approach. Proc. of the Eight IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), June 4-7, 2002, Ottawa, pp. 182-193
  3. Allen, E.; Khoshgoftaar, T.; Chen, Y.: Measuring Coupling and Cohesion of Software Modules: An Information-Theory Approach. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 124-134
  4. Aruna, M.; Devi, M.P.S.; Deepa, M.: Measuring the Quality of Software Modularization Using Coupling-Based Structural Metrics for an OOS System. First International Conference onEmerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, 2008. ICETET '08. Pp. 1130 - 1135
  5. Banker, R.D.; Datar, S.M.; Kemerer, C.F.; Zweig, D.: Software Complexity and Maintenance Costs. Comm. of the ACM, 36(1993)11, pp. 81-94
  6. Basili, V.R.; Hutchens, D.V.: An Empirical Study of a Syntactic Complexity Family. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 9(1983)6, pp. 664-672
  7. Baumann, P.: Software Evaluation -- A Semantical Approach to Information Measures (German). Springer Publ., 1991
  8. Baumann, P.; Richter, L.: Which expressiveness have the actual software metrics? (German). Wirtschaftsinformatik, 34(1992)6, pp. 624-631
  9. Beane, J.; Giddings, N,; Silverman, J.: Quantifying Software Designs. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Software Engineering, Orlando, Florida, March 1984, pp. 314-322
  10. Bieman, J.M.; Ott, L.M.: Measuring Functional Cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(1994)8, pp. 644-657
  11. Briand, L.C.; Thomas, W.M.; Hetmanski, C.J.: Modeling and Managing Risk Early in Software Development. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 17-21, Baltimore, 1993, pp. 55-65
  12. Card, D.N.: Designing Software for Producibility. The Journal of Systems and Software, 17(1992), pp. 219-225
  13. Card, D.N.; Agresti, W.W.: Measuring Software Design Complexity. The Journal of Systems and Software, (1988)8, pp. 185-197
  14. Card, D.N.; Church, V.E.; Agresti, W.W.: An Empirical Study of Software Design Practices. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(1986)2, pp. 264-271
  15. Card, D.N.; Page G.T.; McGarry, F.E.: Criteria for Software Modularization. Proceedings of the 8th International Confenrence on Software Engineering, August 28-30, London, 1985, pp. 372-377
  16. Cook, C.R.; Roesch, A.: Real-Time Software Metrics. The Journal of Systems and Software, 24(1994)3, pp. 223-237
  17. Dhama, H.: Quantitative Models of Cohesion and Coupling in Software.Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 11994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  18. Elshoff, J.L.: Characteristic Program Complexity Measures. IEEE Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, March 26-29, 1984 Orlando, Florida, pp. 288-293
  19. Emerson, T.J.: A Discriminant Metric for Module Cohesion. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, Orlando, Florida, Match 1984, pp. 294-303
  20. Ferneley, E.: An empirical study of coupling and control flow metrics.Information and Software Technology, 39(1997), pp. 879-887
  21. Gannon, J.D.; Katz, E.E.; Basili, V.R.: Metrics for ADA Packages: An Initial Study. Comm. of the ACM, 29(1986)7, pp. 616-623
  22. Gaur, G.; Suri, B.; Singhal, S.: Overview of software engineering metrics for procedural paradigm. Conference on IT in Business, Industry and Government (CSIBIG), 2014, pp. 1-5
  23. Goedicke, M.: Paradigms of modular system development. in: Mitchell; R.J.:Managing Complexity in Software Engineering. IEE Computing Series 17, London, 1990, pp. 1-20
  24. Hall, N.R.; Preiser, S.: Dynamic Complexity Measures for Software Design. IEEE Computer, (1983), pp. 57-66
  25. Harrison, W.: An Entropy-Based Measure of Software Complexity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(1992)11, pp. 1025-1029
  26. Harrison, W.; Cook, C.R.: A Note on the Berry-Meekings Style Metric. Comm. of the ACM, 29(1986)2, pp. 123-125
  27. Henry, S.; Kafura, D.: Software Structure Metrics Based on Information Flow. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 7(1981)5, pp. 510-518
  28. Henry, S,; Kafura, D.: The Evaluation of Software Systems' Structure Using Quantitative Software Metrics. Software - Practice and Experience, 14(1984)6, pp. 561-573
  29. Henry, S.; Selig, C.: Predicting Source-Code Complexity at the Design Stage. IEEE Software, March 1990, pp. 36-44
  30. Kafura, D.; Henry, S.: Software Quality Metrics Based on Interconnectivity. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2 (1982), pp. 121-131
  31. Keutgen, H.: A metric for evaluation of the modularization (German). Lecture Notes on Computer Science 50, Springer Publisher, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1981
  32. Kitchenham, B.A.; Pickard, L.M.; Linkman, S.J.: An evaluation of some design metrics. Software Engineering Journal, January 1990, pp. 50-58
  33. Kraiß, A.; Weikum, G.: Zielorientiertes Performance Engineering auf Basis von Message-orientierter Middleware. In: Tagungsband zum 1. Workshop Performance Engineering in der Softwareentwicklung, Darmstadt, 2000
  34. Ladkin, P.B.; Leuc, S.: Interpreting Message Flow Graphs. Formal Aspect of Computing, 7(1995)5, pp. 472-509
  35. Lakothia, A.: Rule-Based Approach to Computing Module Cohesion. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 17-21, Baltimore, 1993, pp. 35-44
  36. Levine, D.L.; Taylor, R.N.: Metric-Driven Reengineering for Static Concurrency Analysis. Proc. of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), June 28-30, Cambridge, MA, 1993, pp. 40-50
  37. Lohse, J.B.; Zweben, S.H.: Experimental Evaluation of Software Design Principles: An Inverstigation into Effect of Module Coupling on System Modificability. The Journal of Systems and Software, 4 (1984), pp. 301-308
  38. McCabe, T.J.; Butler, C.W.: Design Complexity Measurement and Testing. Comm. of the ACM, 32(1989)12, pp. 1415-1425
  39. Misic, V.: Cohesion is Structural, Coherence is Funcional: Different Views, Different Measures. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 135-144
  40. Moses, J.: A Consideration of the Impact of Interactions with Module Effects on the Direct Measurement of Subjective Software Attributes. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 112-123
  41. Mueller, K.: The use of a CASE tool based structured method to a project realization and the metric based comparison with the conventional development (German). Master's Thesis, TU Magdeburg, 1993
  42. Munson, J.C.; Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: Applications of a Relative Complexity Metric for Software Project Management. The Journal of Systems and Software, 12 (1990), pp. 283-291
  43. Offutt, A.J.; Harrold, J.; Kolte, P.: A Software Metric System for Module Coupling. The Journal of Systems and Software, 20(1993)3, pp. 295-308
  44. Ott, L.M.; Thuss, J.J.: Slice Based Metrics for Estimating Cohesion. Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, May 21-22, 1993, pp. 71-81
  45. Reynolds, R.G.: Metric-based reasoning about pseudocode design in the partial metric system. The Journal of Systems and Software, 27(1987)9, pp. 497-502
  46. Reynolds, R.G.: Metrics to Measure the Complexity of Partial Programs. The Journal of Systems and Software, (1984)4, pp. 75-91
  47. Reynolds, R.G.: PMS: An Inference System to Monitor the Stepwise Refinement of ADA Pseudocode. IEEE Expert 1, (Winter 1986), pp. 43-49
  48. Reynolds, R.G.: The partial metrics system: modeling stepwise refinement process using partial metrics. Comm. of the ACM, 30(1987)11, pp. 956-963
  49. Rising, L.; Calliss, F.W.: An Information-Hiding Metric. The Journal of Systems and Software, 29(1994)3, pp. 211-220
  50. Rising, L.; Calliss, F.W.: Problems with Determining Package Cohesion and Coupling. Software -- Practice and Experience, 22(1992)7, pp, 553-571
  51. Rivlin, E.; Botafogo, R.; Schneiderman, B.: Navigating in Hyperspace: Designing a Structure-Based Toolbox. Comm. of the ACM, 37(1994)2, pp. 87-96
  52. Samadzadeh-Hadidi, M.: Measurable Characteristics of the Software Development Process Based on a Model of Software Comprehension. Ph. Dissertation, University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1987
  53. Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.: Performance analysis of an EAI application integration. Proc. of the UKPE, Warwick, July 2003, pp. 218-230
  54. Sellers, B.H.: Modularization and McCabe`s Cyclomatic Complexity. Comm. of the ACM, 35(1992)12, pp. 17-19
  55. Shatz, S.M.: Towards Complexity Metrics for Ada Tasking. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(1988)8, pp. 1122-1127
  56. Smith, L.M.C.; Samadzadeh, M.H.: Measuring Complexity and Stability of WEB Programs. Structured Programming (1992)13, pp. 35-50
  57. Stetter, F.: Modelling programs by the notion of hypergraph. Software Engineering Journal, March 1989, pp. 107-111
  58. Stetter, F.; Rooyen, H.O.van: Program Measures Based on a Graph-Like Model. EIK 29, Germany, (1993)1, pp. 55-75
  59. Stoll, D.; Leszak, M.; Heck, T.: Measuring Process and Product Characteristics of Software Components - a Case Study. Proc. of the CONQUEST'99, Nuremberg, Germany, September 1999, pp. 80-90
  60. Troy, D.A.; Zweben, S.H.: Measuring the Quality of Structured Design. The Journal of Systems and Software, (1981)2, pp. 113-120
  61. Van Verth, P.B.: A Program Complexity Model that Includes Procedures. Research Report, Buffalo, 1987
  62. Van Verth, P.B.: Testing A Model of Program Quality. SIGCSE Conference 1986, Cincinatti, February 1986, pp. 163-170
  63. Yau, S.S.; Chen, F.: An Approach to Concurrent Control Flow Checking. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 6(1980)2, pp. 126-137
  64. Yau, S.S.; Collofello, J.S.: Design Stability Measures for Software Maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(1985)9, pp. 849-856
  65. Yongjie, L.; Yong, Q.; Meifang, D.: Predict Malfunction-Prone Modules for Embedded System Using Software Metrics. 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, 2007. ICEMI '07. pp. 2-539 - 2-542
  66. Zage, W.M.; Zage, D.M.; Wilburn, C.: Avoiding metric monster: A desing metrics approach. Annals of Software Engineering, 1(1995)1, pp. 43-55

Cookie Einstellungen

Auf unserer Webseite werden Cookies verwendet. Einige davon werden zwingend benötigt, während es uns andere ermöglichen, Ihre Nutzererfahrung auf unserer Webseite zu verbessern. Wir bitten hiermit um Erlaubnis, die folgenden Cookies verwenden zu dürfen. Diese Einwilligung ist freiwillig, nicht für die Nutzung der Website erforderlich und kann jederzeit widerrufen werden.

Essentielle Cookies werden für grundlegende Funktionen der Webseite wie z.B. für die Anmeldung im Mitgliederbereich benötigt. Dadurch ist gewährleistet, dass die Webseite einwandfrei funktioniert.

Name omCookieConsent
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit 1 Jahr
Zweck Enthält die gewählten Tracking-Optin-Einstellungen.
Name fe_typo_user / PHPSESSID
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit aktuelle Session
Zweck Dieses Cookie ist ein Standard-Session-Cookie von TYPO3. Es speichert im Falle eines Benutzer-Logins die Session-ID. So kann der eingeloggte Benutzer wiedererkannt werden und es wird ihm Zugang zu geschützten Bereichen gewährt.

Diese Gruppe beinhaltet alle Skripte für analytisches Tracking und zugehörige Cookies. Es hilft uns die Nutzererfahrung der Website zu verbessern.

Name _pk_id.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 13 Monate
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.
Name _pk_ses.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 30 Minuten
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.