Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Software Quality Assurance Tools

  1. Abran, A., Kunz, M., Dumke, R., Buglione, L.: The prototypical web-based implementation of the QEST model Proc. of the 13th International Workshop on Software Measurement, September 23-25, 2003, Montreal, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 82-92
  2. AMI-Corporation: The AMI Tool. User Manual. V1.01, P.G.C.C. Technologie, Bourg-la-Rei¬ne, Frankreich, 1993.
  3. Bache, R.; Leelasena, L.: QUALMS -- A Tool for Control Flow Analysis and Measurement. South Bank Polytechnic, London, (9 p.) May 1991
  4. Black, S.; Wigg, D.: X-Ray: A Multi-Language, Industrial Strength Tool. Proc. of the IWSM'99, Lac Superieur, Quebec, Canada, September 1999, pp. 39-50
  5. Buglione, L. et al.: A quality model for web-based environments: GUFPI-ISMA viewpoint Proc. of the 13th International Workshop on Software Measurement, September 23-25, 2003, Montreal, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 70-81
  6. Chandra, A.; Ahrens, G.; Kanthanathan, M.: A Software Dependability Measurement Tool. Proc. of the 5ICSQ, October 24-26, 1995, Austin, Texas, pp. 59-71
  7. Daubner, B.: Empowering software development environments by automatic software measurement. 11th IEEE International Symposium Software Metrics, 2005, pp. 3-45
  8. Dekkers, T.: Quality Taylor-Made. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 405-413
  9. Dixon, M.B.; Coxhead, J.F.; Dodman, E.A.: The Enhancement of CASE to Improve Software Quality. Proc. of the ICSQ'95, Maribor, Slovenia, 6-8 Nov. 1995, pp. 27-35
  10. Dumke, R.: Metrics-Integrated CASE Tools. Proc. of the International Conference 2000, Information Resources Management Association, Anchorage, Alaska, May 21-24, 2000, pp. 1208-1209
  11. Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Koeppe, R.; Winkler, A.: Software-Qualität durch Messtools – Assessment, Messung und instrumentiertes ISO 9000. Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden Braunschweig, 1996
  12. Dumke, R.; Grigoleit, H.: Usefulness of CAME tools in Software Quality Assurance. In: Hawkins et al.: The Quality Challenge, MEP Publ., London, 1997, pp. 291-303
  13. Ett, W.H.; Terrel, J.; Lienchan, A.; Krasner, H.: Using Processes Defined in PEAKS to Support Project Management and Product Quality Evaluation. Proc. of the 5ICSQ, June 5-7, 1995, Austin, Texas, pp. 203-215
  14. Foltin, E.; Pilz, S.: A tool to the computer based analysis of the topology in real networks with the use of PC-METRIC (German). Master's Thesis, TU Magdeburg, 1993
  15. Foltin, E.; Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.: Requirements and Design of a Metrics Database for Industrial Use. Proc. of the IWSM'99, Lac Superieur, Quebec, Canada, September 1999, pp. 55-64
  16. Fontaine; Neel,D.; Segot, J.: Computer-Based Systems Quality: The MACSI Method. Second European Conference on Software Quality Assurance, Conf.Proc., Oslo, 1990
  17. Günther, D., Mews, G.: Security Engineering für E-Commerce-Anwendungen.  Diploma Thesis, University of Magdeburg, Germany, 2002
  18. Gustafson, G.G.; Kerr, R.J.: Some Practical Experience with a Software Quality Assurance Program. Comm. of the ACM, 25(1982)1, pp. 4-12
  19. Hatton, L.: SAFER C: Development Software for High-Integrity and Safety-Critical Systems. McGraw-Hill-Verlag, 1994
  20. Herting, H.; Christiansen, M.; Rohde, E.; Schmietendorf, A.: Übersicht und Zusammenspiel der Tools Strategizer - Best/1 - s_aturn im Rahmen eines Software Performance Engineering. In: Schmietendorf et al.: Tagungsband 2. Workshop Performance Engineering in der Softwareentwicklung (PE2001), Munich, Germany, April 2001, pp. 85-106
  21. Herting-Tietze, H.; Schmietendorf, A.: An Overview of Performance Analysis Tools and their Combination in the Area of Software Performance Engineering. Proc. CMG 2001, Computer Measurement Group's International Conference, Anaheim, USA/California, 2001
  22. Hoffmann, B.: Application and Evaluation of a Computer Aided Measurement Tool for the Evaluation of the Project Quality (German). Study, TU Magdeburg, June 1989
  23. Honda, N.; Mano, T.; Hirai, Y.: Quality Assurance System throughout Software Life Cycle. Second European Conference on Software Quality Assurance, Conf.Proc., Oslo, 1990
  24. Huber, M.; Ultsch, H.: Performance-Untersuchung mit dem Lasttreiber s_aturn nach DIN 66273/ISO 14756. In; Dumke et al.: Tagungsband zum 1. Workshop Performance Engineering in der Softwareentwicklung (PE2000), Darmstadt, Germany, May 2000, pp. 81-90
  25. Humblot, D.: Manuel Qualite des Etudes. Reseaux et systemes d'information, Bull, Paris 1990
  26. Jacobson-Rey, M.: Automated Software Inspection - Attaining New Levels or Software Quality. in: Dumke/Lehner: Software-Metriken, DUV, 2000, (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5), S. 1-15
  27. Johnson, B.; Higgins, J.: ITIL and the Software Lifecycle: Pactical Strategy and Design Principles. Van Haren Publ., Amerfoort, Netherland, 2007
  28. Kan, S.H.: Applying the Seven Basic Quality Tools in Software Development. Proceedings of the International Software Quality Exchange, San Francisco, March 10-11, 1992
  29. Kuehne, S.: Integration of SQA Tools in CASE Tools (German). Study, TU Magdeburg, July 1991
  30. Kunz, M.; Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.R.; Rud, D.: SOA-Capability of Software Measurement Tools. In: A. Abran; R. Dumke; M. Ruiz: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (MENSURA 2006), November, 6-8, 2006, Cádiz, Spanien, 2006, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz, Spanien, S. 216-225
  31. Kunz, M.; Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.; Wille, C.: Towards a Service-Oriented Measurement Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 3rd Software Measurement European Forum (Smef 2006), May, 10-12, 2006, Rome, Italy, S. 197-207
  32. Kunz, M.; Zenker, N.; Mencke, S.; Dumke, R.: "Unit Metrics" - A Tool to support Refactoring in Agile Software Development. Proceedings of the 2008 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (Worldcomp 2008),July, 14-17, 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
  33. Laitenberger, O.; Dreyer, H.M.: Evaluating the Usefulness and the Ease of Use of a Web-based Inpecstion Data Collection Tool. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 122-132
  34. Lapierre, S.; Laguë, B.; Leduc, C.: Datrix™ Source Code Model and its Interchange Format: Lessons Learned and Considerations for Future Work. Software Engineering Notes, 26(2001)1, pp. 53-56
  35. Leiste, H.: Conception of a Software Evaluation Tool (German). Proceedings of the Workshop Computer Aided Software Evaluation, TU Magdeburg, October 1990, pp. 50-62
  36. Leiste, H.: Implementation of a prototype of a software evaluation tool (German). Master's Thesis, TU Magdeburg, 1991
  37. Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Pan, B.; Xing, D.: A Measurement Tool for Object Oriented Software and Measurement Experiments with It. In: Dumke/Abran: New Approaches in Software Measurement, LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001, pp. 44-54
  38. LOGISCOPE: Part of the Software Quality Report. VERILOG, Munich, 1991
  39. LOGISCOPE: Editor 3.1, User's Manual, Verilog, Toulouse, Dec. 1991
  40. LOGISCOPE: Analyzers, Reference Manual, Verilog, Toulouse, Febr. 1992
  41. Lyu, M.R.; Nikora, A.P.; Farr, W.H.: A systematic and comprehensive tool for software reliability modeling and measurement. The Twenty-Third International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1993. FTCS-23, pp.648-653
  42. Mathes, W.: CASE and software quality assurance (german). Proceedings of the TOOL'91, Karlsruhe, November 1991, pp. 291-296
  43. Mueller, S.: Investigations to metric based CASE tools (German). Master's Thesis, TU Magdeburg, 1992
  44. Oliveira, K. M.; Cerqueira, A.; Xexeo, G.; Rocha, R.: QUAL-CORDIS: A Domain-Specific Tool for the Identification of Software Quality Requirements Using Fuzzy Theory. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 487-496
  45. QUALIGRAPH - An Automated Tool for Software Quality Control & Graphic Documentation - General Information Manual, Szki, Budapest, Hungary, 1989
  46. Padda, H. K., Seffah, A., Strika, J.: QUIM: A tool and knowledge map for usability measurement Proc. of the 13th International Workshop on Software Measurement, September 23-25, 2003, Montreal, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 93-112
  47. Scharl, A.; Treiblmaier, H.: A Quantitative Analysis of eCRM Tools in the Austrian Pharmaceutical Industry. roc. of the International Conference non Web Engineering (ICWE 2003), Oviedo, Spain, July 2003, pp. 306-309
  48. Seaman, C. B.; Mandonca, M. G.; Basili, V. R.; Kim, V. M.: User Interface Evaluation and Empirically-Based Evolution of a Prototype Experience Management Tool. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(2003)9, pp. 838-850
  49. Shuangshuang Zhang; Wang, Yingxu: An extension of SEMEST: the online software engineering measurement tool. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3(2004), pp. 1519-1522
  50. Sneed, H.: SofttCalc 4.1 - User Manual. SES Software Engineering Services GmbH, Munich, Germany: SES Press, 1995
  51. Sneed, H.M.; Merey, A.: Automated Software Quality Assurance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(1983)9, pp. 909-916
  52. Szentes, J.; Jannasch, H.: QUALIGRAPH -- a tool to the measurement of software quality and the graphical presentation of software (German). Proceedings of the Workshop Computer Aided Software Evaluation, TU Magdeburg, October 1990, pp. 80-82
  53. Tiedge, I.: Extension of the software evaluation program SVS to a measurement program (German). Master's Thesis, TU Magdeburg, 1992
  54. Tsalidis, C.: {Software Quality Measurement Tools. Athens Technology Center, Research Report, Athen, Greece 1991
  55. Weiß, M.: Konzeption und prototypische Implementierung einer agentenbasierten Web-Qualitätssicherung. Diploma Thesis, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, 2004
  56. Windpassinger, H.: Möglichkeiten der metrik-basierten Modellierung und Auswertung von Qualitätsvorgaben mit dem Werkzeug LOGISCOPE. in: Dumke/Lehner: Software-Metriken, DUV, 2000, (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5), pp. 135-152
  57. Wijata, Y. I.; Niehaus, D. and Frost, V. S.: A Scalable Agent-Based Network Measurement Infrastructure. IEEE Communications Vol. 38, (2000), No. 9, pp. 174-183
  58. Yamada, A.; Hirayama, M.; Sato, H.; Tsuda, J.: Quantitative Analysis Method of Software Design Characteristics for Quality Improvement. Second European Conference on Software Quality Assurance, Conf. Proc., Oslo, 1990 
  59. Yazbek, H.: A Concept of Quality Assurance for Metrics in CASE-Tools. Software Engineering Notes, Volume 35, Number 5, September 2010, ACM New York, S. 57
  60. Yazbek, H.: Framework of Quality Measurement in CASE Tool Based Software Development. Dissertationsschrift, Universität Magdeburg, Fakultät für Informatik, 2010

Cookie Einstellungen

Auf unserer Webseite werden Cookies verwendet. Einige davon werden zwingend benötigt, während es uns andere ermöglichen, Ihre Nutzererfahrung auf unserer Webseite zu verbessern. Wir bitten hiermit um Erlaubnis, die folgenden Cookies verwenden zu dürfen. Diese Einwilligung ist freiwillig, nicht für die Nutzung der Website erforderlich und kann jederzeit widerrufen werden.

Essentielle Cookies werden für grundlegende Funktionen der Webseite wie z.B. für die Anmeldung im Mitgliederbereich benötigt. Dadurch ist gewährleistet, dass die Webseite einwandfrei funktioniert.

Name omCookieConsent
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit 1 Jahr
Zweck Enthält die gewählten Tracking-Optin-Einstellungen.
Name fe_typo_user / PHPSESSID
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit aktuelle Session
Zweck Dieses Cookie ist ein Standard-Session-Cookie von TYPO3. Es speichert im Falle eines Benutzer-Logins die Session-ID. So kann der eingeloggte Benutzer wiedererkannt werden und es wird ihm Zugang zu geschützten Bereichen gewährt.

Diese Gruppe beinhaltet alle Skripte für analytisches Tracking und zugehörige Cookies. Es hilft uns die Nutzererfahrung der Website zu verbessern.

Name _pk_id.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 13 Monate
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.
Name _pk_ses.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 30 Minuten
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.