Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Software Test Measurements

  1. Abu, G., Cangussu, J. W., and Turi, J.: A quantitative learning model for software test process>/i>. In HICSS ’05: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Track 3, 2005, page 78.2,Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  2. Adler, M. and Gray, M. A. (1983): A formalization of Myers causeeffect graphs for unit testing. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 8(5):24–32.
  3. Agrawal, H.: Efficient Coverage Testing Using Global Dominator Graphs. SE Notes, 24(1999)5, pp. 11-20
  4. Alagar, V. S.; Ormandjieva, O.: Testing Measurement in Real-Time Reactive Systems. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 487-495
  5. Arlt, R.: Management of the failure correction process. Proc. of the CONQUEST 2001, Nuremberg, Germany, September 2001, pp. 41-50
  6. Astels, D. (2003). Test Driven development: A Practical Guide. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference.
  7. Avestisyan, A. I. et al.: Open Cirrus: A Global Cloud Comuting Testbed. IEE Computer, 43(2010)4, pp. 35-43
  8. Bache, R.; Muellerburg, M.: Measures of testability as a basis for quality assurance. Software Engineering Journal, March 1990, pp. 85-92
  9. Bainbridge, J.: Defining Testability Metrics Axiomatically. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 4(1994), pp. 63-80
  10. Basanieri, F.; Bertolino, A.; Marchetti, E.: CoWTeST: A Cost Weighted Test Strategy. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 387-396
  11. Basili, V.R.; Selby, R.W.: Comparing the Effectiveness of Software Testing Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(1987)12, pp. 1278-1296
  12. Bastani, F.B.; DiMarco, G.; Pasquini, A.: Experimental Evaluation of a Fuzzy-Set Based Measure of Software Correctness Using Program Mutation. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 17-21, Baltimore, 1993, pp. 45-54
  13. Baudry, B.; Traon, Y. Le; Sunye, G.: Testability Analysis of a UML Class Diagram. Proc. of the Eight IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), June 4-7, 2002, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 54-65
  14. Beizer, B. (1995). Black-box testing: techniques for functional testing of software and systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  15. Bertolino, A. (2007). Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams. In FOSE ’07: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, pages 85–103, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  16. Bochmann; G.v. et al.: Summary of Discussion on 'Design for Testatbility'. Montreal, July, 1992
  17. Boehm, B.; Basili, V. R.: Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List. IEEE Computer, January 2001, pp. 135-137
  18. Briand, L.C.; Basili, V.R.; Hetmanski, C.J.: Providing an Empirical Basis for Optimizing the Verification and Testing Phases of Software Development. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 8-9, 1992, pp. 329-338
  19. Briand, L. and Labiche, Y. (2004). Empirical studies of software testing techniques: challenges, practical strategies, and future research. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 29(5):1–3.
  20. Broekman, B.: Estimating testing effort, using test point analysis (TPA).Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 323-338
  21. Broekman, B. and Notenboom, E. (2003). Testing Embedded Software. Addison-Wesley, Great Britain
  22. Burnstein, I. (2003). Practical Software Testing: A Process-oriented Approach. Springer Inc., New York, NY, USA
  23. Cai, X.; Lyu, M.R.: Software Reliability Modeling with Test Coverage: Experimentation and Measurement with A Fault-Tolerant Software Project. The 18th IEEE International Symposium onSoftware Reliability, 2007. ISSRE '07, pp. 17-26
  24. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., and Visaggio, C. A.(2006). Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals. In ISESE ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, pages 364–371, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  25. Cangusse, J. W.; DeCarlo, R. A.; Mathur, A. P.: Monitoring the Software Test Process Using Statistical Process Coontrol: A Logarithmic Approach. Software Engineering Notes, 28(2003)5, pp. 158-167
  26. Carr, G.: Independent Testing at the Prudential. First European International Conference on Software Testing, Analysis & Review (EuroStar), London, October 25-28, 1993, pp. 37-42
  27. Carbno, C. C.: Using Calibrated Zipf Capture-Recapture for Estimating the Defects Remaining. In: Dumke/Abran: Current Trends in Software Measurement, Shaker Publ., Aachen, Germany, 2001, pp. 143-152
  28. Chang, J.; Richardson, D. J.: Structural Specification-Based Testing: Automatd Support and Experimental Evaluation. Proc. of the ESEC/FSE'99, Toulouse, France, September 1999, pp. 285-302
  29. Chen, Y., Probert, R. L., and Robeson, K.: Effective test metrics for test strategy evolution. In CASCON ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, 2004, pages 111–123. IBM Press.
  30. Chernak, Y. (2004). Introducing TPAM: Test process assessment model. Crosstalk-The Journal of Defense Software Engineering.
  31. Chung, C.M.; Shih, T.K.; Wang,C.C.: Integration object-oriented software testing and metrics. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 7(1997)1, pp. 125-144
  32. Chusho, T.: Test Data Selection and Quality Estimation Based on the Concept of Essential Branches for Path Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(1987)5, pp. 509-517
  33. Emerson, T.J.: Program Testing, Path Coverage, and the Cohesion Metric. IEEE COMPSAC, 1984, pp. 421-431
  34. Davey, S. et. al.: Metrics Collection in Code and Unit Test as Part of Continous Quality Improvement. First European International Conference on Software Testing, Analysis & Review (EuroStar), London, October 25-28, 1993, pp. 37-42
  35. Debbarma, M.K.; Kar, N.; Saha, A.: Static and dynamic software metrics complexity analysis in regression testing. International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 2012, pp. 1-6
  36. Drabick, R. D.: Best Practices for the Formal Software Testing Process:A Menu of Testing Tasks. Dorset House, 2003
  37. Ebert, Ch.; Liedtke, T.: Experience in complexity-based error estimation. (German) in: Dumke/Zuse: Theorie und Praxis der Softwaremessung, Deutscher Universitaetsverlag, Wiesbaden, 1994, pp.78-96
  38. Eickelmann, N.: Measuring and evaluating the software test process. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 339-346
  39. Elbaum, S.; Gable, D.; Rothermel, G.: Understanding and Measuring the Source of Variation in the Priorization of Regression Test Suites. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 169-180
  40. Elbaum, S.; Malishevski, A.G.; Rothermal, G.: Test Case Priorization: A Family of Empirical Studies. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 28(2002)2, pp. 146-158
  41. Eldh, S., Hansson, H., Punnekkat, S., Pettersson, A., and Sundmark, D.: A framework for comparing efficiency, effectiveness and applicability of software testing techniques. In TAIC-PART ’06: Proceedings of the Testing: Academic & Industrial Conference on Practice And Research Techniques, 2006, pages 159–170, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  42. El-Far, I. K. and Whittaker, J. A.: Model-based software testing. Encyclopedia on Software Engineering, 2001
  43. Eski, S.; Buzluca, F.: An Empirical Study on Object-Oriented Metrics and Software Evolution in Order to Reduce Testing Costs by Predicting Change-Prone Classes. IEEE Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 2011, pp. 566 - 571
  44. Evanco, W.M.: Ordered Response Models for the Analysis of Software Fault Correction Effort. Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  45. Farooq, A.: An Evaluation Framework for Software Test Processes. University of Magdeburg, Dept. of Computer Science, PhD, 2009
  46. Farooq, A.; Dumke, R.R.: A Critical Analysis of Testing Maturity Model. Metrics News, Journal of GI-Interest Group on Software Metrics, 12(2007)1, Februar 2007, S. 35-40
  47. Farooq, A., Dumke, R. R., Hegewald, H., and Wille, C.: Structuring test process metrics. In MetriKon 2007: Proceedings of the DASMA Software Metrik Kongress,2007, pages 95–102, Aachen, Germany. Shaker Verlag.
  48. Farooq, A., Dumke, R. R., Schmietendorf, A., and Hegewald, H.: A classification scheme for test process metrics. In SEETEST 2008: South East European Software Testing Conference, Heidelberg, Germany. dpunkt.verlag 
  49. Farooq, A.; Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R.R.: A Meta-Measurement Approach for Software Test Processes. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE - International Multitopic Conference (IEEE INMIC 2008), December, 23-24, 2008, Karachi, Pakistan, S. 333-338, Bahria University, Karachi Campus & IEEE-Karachi Sectio
  50. Farooq, A.; Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R. R.: Challenges in Evaluating SOA Test Processes. In: Dumke/Braungarten/Büren/Abran/Cuadrado-Gallego: Software Process und Product Measurement. LNCS 5338,Springer-Verlag, 2008, S. 107-11
  51. Farooq, A.; Georgieva, K.; Schmietendorf, A.; Dumke, R.R.: A Systematic Method for Identifying Testing Project Risks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality Engineering in Software Technology (CONQUEST 2010), 20-22 September, 2010, Dresden, Germany, CD-ROM
  52. Fehlmann, T.; Kranich, E.: Measuring Software tests with COSMIC. In: Büren et al.: MetriKon 2013 – Praxis der Software-Messung, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2013
  53. Fink, G.; Bishop, M.: Property-Based Testing: A New Approach to Testing for Assurance. Software Engineering Notes, (1997)4, July, pp. 74-80
  54. Georgieva, K.: Testing of Aspect Oriented Programs - Testing Aspect Oriented Programs as Object Oriented Ones. Lambert Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG Saarbrücken, 2010
  55. Georgieva, K.; Farooq, A.; Dumke R.R.: A Risk Taxonomy for the Software Testing Process. In: G. Büren, R.R. Dumke: Praxis der Software-Messung - Tagungsband des DASMA Software Metrik Kongresses (MetriKon 2009), Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag Aachen, 2009, S. 247-260
  56. Grottke, M.; Dussa-Ziegler, K.: Systematic vs. Operational Testing. Proc. of the CONQUEST 2001, Nuremberg, Germany, September 2001, pp. 59-68
  57. Gutjahr, W. J. (1999). Partition testing vs. random testing: The influence of uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 25(5):661–674
  58. Harris, I. G. (2006). A coverage metric for the validation of interacting processes. In DATE ’06: Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, pages 1019–1024, 3001 Leuven, Belgium, Belgium. European Design and Automation Association
  59. Harrison, W.: Using Software Metrics to Allocate Testing Resources. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(1988)4, pp. 93-105
  60. Horgan, J.R.; London, S.; Lyu, M.R.: Achieving Software Quality with Testing Coverage Measures. IEEE Computer, September 1994, pp. 60-68
  61. Humayun, S.; Soomro, M.H.: Development of a test bed for monitoring & control software of a ground station & its analysis by application of standard software metrics. International Conference on Aerospace Science & Engineering (ICASE), 2013, pp. 1-5
  62. Hutcheson, M. L. (2003). Software Testing Fundamentals: Methods and Metrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA
  63. IEEE Standard for Software Test Documentation. IEEE Std 829-1983, New York, February 1983
  64. Jianping Fu; Minyan Lu: Request-Oriented Method of Software Testability Measurement. International Conference onInformation Technology and Computer Science, 2009. ITCS 2009. pp. 77-80
  65. Jungmayr, S.: Testability Measurement and Software Dependencies. Proc. of the 12th International Workshop on Software Measurement, October 7-9, 2002, Magdeburg, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 179-202
  66. ] Kan, S. H., Parrish, J., and Manlove, D. (2001). In-process metrics for software testing. IBM Systems Journal, 40(1):220–241
  67. Kapfhammer, G. M.; Soffa, M. L.: A Family of Test Adequacy Criteria for Database-Driven Applications. Software Engineering Notes, 28(2003)5, pp. 98-107
  68. Katkov, V.L.; Shimarov, V.A.: A Quantitative Approach to Program Testing Quality Control. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software Quality, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 3-5, 1992, pp. 215-222
  69. Katkov, V.L.; Shimarov, V.A.: Structural Software Testing Criteria Evaluation. Proceedings of the International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Practice of the Future, St. Petersburg, 1993, pp. 558-565
  70. Keese, P.; Meyerhoff, D.: Experiences from Business Integration Testing. Proc. of the CONQUEST 2001, Nuremberg, Germany, September 2001, pp. 51-58
  71. Khoshgoftaar, T.M.; Allen, E.B.; Gramont, A.: Identification Change-Prone Telecommunications Software Modules During Testing and Maintenance.Proc. of the AOWSM, June 5-7, 1995, Oregon, Section 9
  72. Koshgoftaar, T.M.; Szabo, R.M.: ARIMA Models of Software System Quality.Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  73. Lasalle, H.: A Structural Approach to Improvement the Testing Process. in Kelly, M.: Management and Measurement of Software Quality, UNICOM SEMINARS, Middlesex, UK, 1993, pp. 121-130
  74. Leszak, M.; Brunck, W.; Mößler, G.: Analysis of Software Defects in a Large Evolutionary Telecommunication Systems. Proc. of the 12th International Workshop on Software Measurement, October 7-9, 2002, Magdeburg, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 268-290
  75. Lewis, W. E.: Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement. Auerbach Publ./ CRC Press, 2000
  76. Liang, D.; Harrold, M. J.: Equivalence Analysis and its Application in Improving the Efficiency of Program Slicing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(2002)3, pp. 347-383
  77. Liggesmeyer, P.: A set of complexity metrics for guiding the software test process. Software Quality Journal, 4(1995), pp. 257-273
  78. Liggesmeyer, P.: Software-Qualität. Testen, Analysieren und Verifizieren von Software. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2002
  79. Malevris, N.; Yates, D.F.; Veevers A.: Pedictive metric for likely feasibility of program paths. Information and Software Technology, 32(1990)2, pp. 115-118
  80. May, J.H.R.; Lunn, A.D.: A Model of Code Sharing for Estimating Software Failure on Demand Probabilities. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(1995)9, pp. 747-753
  81. McAllister, M.; Vuong, S.T.; Alilivic-Curgus, J.: Automated Test Case Selection Based on Test Coverage Metrics. Proceedings of the INPTS`92, Montreal, Sept/Oct 1992, pp. 63-76
  82. McColl, R.B.; McKim, J.C.: Evaluating and Extending NPath as a Software Complexity Measure. The Journal of Systems and Software, 7(1992) pp. 275-279
  83. Meng, L.; Lu, M.; Huang, B.; Xu, X.: Using Relative Complexity Measurement Which from Complex Network Method to Allocate Resources in Complex Software System's Gray-Box Testing. International Symposium on Computer Science and Society (ISCCS), 2011, pp. 189-192
  84. Mills, K.L.: An Experimental Evaluation of Specification Techniques for Improving Functional Testing. The Journal of Systems and Software, 32(1996)1, pp. 83-95
  85. Morgan, J.A.; Knafl, G.J.; Wong, W.E.: Predicting Fault Detection Effectiveness. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 82-89
  86. Muellerburg, M.: Fundamental Concepts of Software Testing. GMD Research Report, Birlinghoven, March 1991
  87. Muellerburg, M.: Software Testing: A Stepwise Process. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Software Quality Assurance, Oslo, 1990
  88. Munson, J.C.; Hall, G.A.: Software Measurement Based Statistical Testing.Proc. of the AOWSM, June 5-7, 1995, Oregon, Section 8
  89. Nejmeh, B.A.: NPATH: A Measure of Execution Path Complexity and Its Applications. Comm. of the ACM, 31(1988)2, pp. 188-200
  90. Obara, E. et al.: Metrics and Analysis in the Test Phase of Large-Scale Software. The Journal of Systems and Software, 38(1997)1, pp. 37-46
  91. Neumann, R.: Serviceorientiertes Testen mit Hilfe von virtualisierten Lasttreibern aus der Cloud. In: Schmietendorf, A.: BSOA/BCloud 2013, Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2013, S. 65-66
  92. Neumann, R.; Dumke, R.; Schmietendorf, A.: Enterprise Mashups - Usefulness and Relevance Put to the Test. In: H.R. Arabnia; H. Reza; L. Deligiannidis (Associate Editors: J.J. Cuadrado-Gallego; V. Schmidt; A.M.G. Solo): Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Software Engineering Research & Practice, WORLDCOMP 2010 (SERP 2010), Volume I, July 12-15, 2010, Las Vegas Nevada, USA, CSREA Press, S. 226-232
  93. Offutt, A.J.; Pan, J.; Tewary, K.; Zhang, T.: An Experimental Evaluation of Data Flow and Mutation Testing. Software - Practice and Experience, 26(1996)2, pp. 165-176
  94. Olsson, T.; Bauer, N.; Runeson, P.; Bratthall, L.: An Experiment on Lead-Time Impact in Testing of Distributed Real-Time Systems. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 159-168
  95. Orso, A.; Apiwattanapong, T.; Harrold, M. J.: Leveraging Field Data for Impact Analysis and Regression Testing. Software Engineering Notes, 28(2003)5, pp. 128-137
  96. Paton, K.: Should you test the code before you test the program? Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 377-386
  97. Pilz, S.; Foltin, E.: Foundations to the development of test metrics for local area networks (German). Study, TU Magdeburg, July 1992
  98. Piwowarski, P.; Ohba, M.; Caruso, J.: Coverage Measurement Experience During Function Test. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 17-21, Baltimore, 1993, pp. 287-301
  99. Pol, M.: Measuring test process improvement. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 23-27
  100. Reid, S.C.: An Empirical Analysis of Equivalence Partitioning, Boundary Value Analysis and Random Testing. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 64-73
  101. Royer, T.C.: Software Testing Management - Life on the Critical Path.Prentice-Hall Inc., 1993
  102. Schaefer, H.: Inspection Handbook for Computer Program Development Projects. Report No. 84 01 41-9, Oslo, July 1984
  103. Schaefer, H.: Organization and managing of the software testing (German). Tutorium-Heft, Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Qualitaetsfoerderung, Zuerich, Switzerland, September 1991
  104. Seddio, C.: Integrating Test Metrics within a Software Enginnering Measurement Program at Eastman Kodak Company: A Follow-up Case Study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 20(1993)3, pp. 227-235
  105. Shimarov, V.A.: Definition and quantitative evaluation of test criteria. Proc. of the Fourth European Conference on Software Quality, October 17-20, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 350-360
  106. Shyamala. M.: Empirycally Evaluating Software Testing Processes Using the Test Process Evaluation Framework. Master Thesis, Universuty of Magdeburg, Germany, 2009
  107. Singh, Y.; Saha, A.: Prediction of testability using the design metrics for object-oriented software. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 44(2012)1, pp. 12-22
  108. Sneed, H. M.: Test metrics. Metrics News, Journal of GI-Interest Group on Software Metrics,2007, 12(1):41–51
  109. Sneed, H. and S. Jungmayr.: Product and Process Metrics for the Software Test. InformatikSpektrum, Band 29, Nr. 1, Feb. 2006, pg. 23 (2006)
  110. Spillner, A.: Test Coverage Metrics for the Integrations Testing. (German)in: Dumke/Zuse: Theorie und Praxis der Softwaremessung, Deutscher Universitaetsverlag, Wiesbaden, 1994, pp. 59-77
  111. Spillner, A.: Test criteria and coverage measure for software integrated testing. Software Quality Journal, 4(1995), pp. 275-286
  112. Staknis, M.E.: Software quality assurance through prototyping and automated testing. Information and Software Technology, 32(1990)1, pp. 26-33
  113. Sy, N. T.; Deville, Y.: Consistency Techniques for Interprocedural Test Data Generation. Software Engineering Notes, 28(2003)5, pp. 108-127
  114. Tackett, B.D.; Doren, B.V.: Process Control for Error-free Software: A Software Success Story. IEEE Software, May/June 1999, pp. 24-29
  115. Tai, K.: Predicate-Based Test Generation for Computer Programs. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 17-21, Baltimore, 1993, pp. 267-276
  116. Traon, Y. L.; Robach, C.: Testability Measurements for Data Flow Designs.Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 91-98
  117. Verma, S., Ramineni, K., and Harris, I. G.: An efficient control oriented coverage metric. In ASP-DAC ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Asia South Pacific design automation, pages 317–322, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press
  118. Voas, J.M.; Miller, K.W.: Semantic Metrics for Software Testability. The Journal of Systems and Software, 20(1993)3, pp. 207-216
  119. Weyuker, E.J.: Can We Measure Sofwtare Testing Effectiveness? Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, May 21-22, 1993, pp. 100-107
  120. Woodward, M.R.; Hedley, M.A.; Hennell, M.A.: Experience with Path Analysis and Testing of Programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 6(1980)3, pp. 278-286
  121. Xu, P.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.: Application of software testability measurement model SPM to software testing. 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 2009. ICRMS 2009. pp. 733-737
  122. Xu, L.; Xu, B.; Nie, C.; Chen, H.; Yang, H.: A Browser Compatibility Testing Method Based on Combinatorial Testing. Proc. of the International Conference non Web Engineering (ICWE 2003), Oviedo, Spain, July 2003, pp. 310-313
  123. Yeh, P.;Lin, J.: Software Testability Measurements Derived from Data Flow Analysis. Proc. of the CSMR'98, March 8-11, 1998, Florence, Italy, pp. 96-102
  124. Zhang, Y.: IEEE Software, September/October 2004, pp. 80-86
  125. Zhu, H.; Hall, P.A.V.: Test data adequacy measurement. Software Engineering Journal, January 1993, pp. 21-29

Cookie Einstellungen

Auf unserer Webseite werden Cookies verwendet. Einige davon werden zwingend benötigt, während es uns andere ermöglichen, Ihre Nutzererfahrung auf unserer Webseite zu verbessern. Wir bitten hiermit um Erlaubnis, die folgenden Cookies verwenden zu dürfen. Diese Einwilligung ist freiwillig, nicht für die Nutzung der Website erforderlich und kann jederzeit widerrufen werden.

Essentielle Cookies werden für grundlegende Funktionen der Webseite wie z.B. für die Anmeldung im Mitgliederbereich benötigt. Dadurch ist gewährleistet, dass die Webseite einwandfrei funktioniert.

Name omCookieConsent
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit 1 Jahr
Zweck Enthält die gewählten Tracking-Optin-Einstellungen.
Name fe_typo_user / PHPSESSID
Anbieter gi.de
Laufzeit aktuelle Session
Zweck Dieses Cookie ist ein Standard-Session-Cookie von TYPO3. Es speichert im Falle eines Benutzer-Logins die Session-ID. So kann der eingeloggte Benutzer wiedererkannt werden und es wird ihm Zugang zu geschützten Bereichen gewährt.

Diese Gruppe beinhaltet alle Skripte für analytisches Tracking und zugehörige Cookies. Es hilft uns die Nutzererfahrung der Website zu verbessern.

Name _pk_id.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 13 Monate
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.
Name _pk_ses.1.9dca
Anbieter Matomo
Laufzeit 30 Minuten
Zweck Dieses Cookie wird von der Open-Source-Software Matomo für die statistische Auswertung der Besucherzugriffe verwendet.